Shop

If you are starting to research the law school admissions process, or are looking into your chances at a given school, you may have come across some unfamiliar admissions lingo: “splitter.” It’s not a sports term. Let’s familiarize you with “splitters” and “reverse-splitters” and find out if you are one.

What is a splitter?

A splitter is what we call a law school applicant that has a high LSAT, but a relatively low GPA to go with it. In terms of how we define “low” and “high”, a high LSAT, for example, would be over the 75th percentile for a school. For an example, let’s look at UChicago’s admissions profile:

LSAT 25thLSAT MedianLSAT 75thGPA 25thGPA MedianGPA 75th
University of Chicago
Law School
1671711733.733.893.93

For The University of Chicago, someone with an LSAT of 173 or better and a GPA of 3.73 or lower would be considered a “splitter.”

What is a reverse splitter?

A “reverse-splitter,” as you might have guessed, is someone with a 75th percentile or better GPA, and a 25th percentile or lower LSAT. In my observation reverse-splitters are considerably more common than traditional splitters.

What is a super splitter?

You may also hear the term “super-splitters.” These are a people with a very large disparity is scores, like a 2.3 GPA with a 176. In an upcoming post, we will discuss how splitters are likely to fare in the admissions process. I will say now that traditional high LSAT splitters tend to fare very well in the admissions process.

Low GPA? You need to be a High LSAT Splitter!

If you have a lower GPA that is locked in and are looking to become a splitter, you’ll need all the help you can get. Come check out our FULL LSAT COURSE, which has the most actual lesson content of any on the market. We explain how the test makers think about the test, with no short-cuts. We are looking forward to helping you with rigorous preparation for this all-important test.

Share.

University of Chicago, J.D., 2012 Ready to Kickstart your LSAT Prep? Join the LSAT Mastermind Study Group

2 Comments

  1. The article has been instead grabbing and intriguing enough to receive all possible nuances to remember.
    I do get pleasure from reading the content and the writing manner of the
    author, etc..

  2. Hi Evan,

    I have a question for you. I am applying to law school for this coming Fall semester. I took the LSAT in February of 2016, and got a 157. I then decided to take some time off to work, and took the LSAT again in November 2018, and received a 160. I thought that it would make sense to try to take the test one more time in January, and unfortunately, received a 159.

    I have submitted applications to Pepperdine, Ohio State, UC Irvine, UC Davis, UCLA, USC, University of San Diego, Loyola Marymount, and Wake Forest. Do you think that I need to submit an addendum explaining why I got a 159 after my 160? Or do you think that those schools will just consider my top score?

    Thanks!!!

Leave A Reply