To make this post, I took myself back to when I too was an LSAT noob and thought, what do I wish I had known when I started studying for the LSAT? Well, I wish I had known that the economy was going to implode later that year (2008) and take the legal market with it, but let’s forget that. This is for LSAT specific stuff. We’ll do a “10 things I wish I knew before I decided to go to law school” post soon.
Here are 7 things it would have helped me to know at the beginning of my LSAT prep. Not later, when I actually learned it. We’ve covered more conventional wisdom elsewhere (page to the bottom for links), so here I want to focus on some of the things that may not be critical to know right away, but sure help.
7 Things I Wish I'd Known When I Started Studying For The LSAT
I had the mistaken idea early in my prep that I should learn a little about at least two section types each day, so I’d study a little LG and maybe some RC, for example. I thought variety would help stave off boredom, but I think it hurt my early prep efforts to do this.
It’s better to keep to one subject a day when you are first learning this stuff. After you’ve learned the fundamentals, it’s okay to bounce around more.
Getting into the test center and realizing you have a hobbit-sized desk is the worst.
During your whole prep time, you may have been spreading out your practice materials luxuriously across the wide expanse of your home table, and you show up on test day only to realize realize that the desk you’ll be sitting at during the most important exam of your life you’re expected to cram in and keep the test booklet folded just so it can fit? That could throw anyone off.
This almost happened to me. Luckily, I was okay because I had scoped out the test center, new it was coming, and practiced having no space. However, if I could do it again, I would have just avoided the whole snafu by choosing a testing center more carefully. Use Google and you can usually get info on the places you should avoid.
Also, sign-up for the LSAT relatively early so that the better locations aren’t full.
Vince Lombardi once said, “winners never quit and quitters never win” I don’t think that’s so true when it comes to LSAT study — sometimes you just have to know when to give up for the night. If your exhausted, studying might even hurt you.
I had the idea that powering through it when I was tired would help me be ready in case I was tired the day of the test. Well you might want to try it a couple times, studying tired just isn’t that helpful. It’s not like cramming for a college exam where you just have to remember the stuff for the next 12 hours. You are trying to develop a skill that you can wield like a pro no matter what.
Late night, tired-out studying is probably even worse later in your prep when you are combating burnout. Then, time sleeping should be the priority over another hour of prep. This doesn’t mean you should skimp a lot on total study time. Rather, consider shuffling your schedule around so that you are prepping when you are alert.
If your getting insurance, usually the first thing you think is “GEICO!” Now I have no idea whether Geico is the best or not, I just know they’ve done really well building a national brand.
When I was an LSAT neophyte, I got some Kaplan and Princeton Review books because, well, I recognized the brand names. The younger me wasn’t very smart.
You are future lawyers now, so it’s time to stop with the knee-jerk buying decisions.
Seek advice before you decide, and not just mine, though I’ll give mine here: avoid Kaplan and Princeton Review, especially their books.
Related: Best LSAT Prep Courses
If they ever were making cutting-edge LSAT materials, it must have been before Clinton was President. Nowadays they just treat potential LSAT students like this:
It’s just a money game for them, and that’s reflected in the quality of their stuff.
I always say to go with the companies that got their start teaching LSAT prep. They have better reputations in the law school world and a bigger incentive to protect that reputation.
If you have a question about any specific prep resource, ask in the comments below. As a former professional LSAT tutor and now part-time LSAT blogger, I’ve seen it all. If you’re self-studying, you can find our recommendations here: How I Got A 177 On The LSAT and check out our recommended LSAT Study Schedules here.
That’s the wrong attitude. Learning the fundamentals is just stage one. It’s probably 30% or less of the game. The real meat of LSAT study is where you sit your ass down and apply these techniques over and over again until you know the right methods in your sleep.
I suspect this particular misconception is why so many poor, innocent LSAT students study only a month or so before the test. They end up having wasted time and money and now have to do the whole thing over, or worse, they go to law school with a substandard score. Really, a month is just about enough time to learn the basic techniques. It’s not enough time to start getting good at them.
You should be deeply suspicious of any LSAT company that purports to be able to get you ready for the LSAT inside the space of a month. One of the companies whose products I otherwise like, Powerscore, provides instruction tailored to short term studiers, and it’s unfortunate. For over 99% of test takers, that time-frame is not going to get you close to your potential, and they know that.
For our full-reasoning on this, see this post on how long you should prep for the LSAT.
This amounts to what we call in the evidence law a statement against interest, since I run an LSAT prep blog, but I’m basically telling you it’s okay not to spend a crazy amount of time on the internet looking up LSAT related stuff.
When I was prepping, I got kind of sucked into the information overload. I was kind of surprised later when I found out that many, many LSAT takers are successful without having consulted the internet for every decision they made regarding their LSAT prep habits.
LSAT prep can be very straightforward, so if it feels natural to isolate yourself from the noise on the internet, that’s okay. Just remember what you need to do and you can’t go wrong:
Step 1: Pick great LSAT prep materials to learn the fundamental techniques that will serve as the foundation of your prep.
Step 2: Learn how to approach the problems using a consistent approach (consider consulting with our LSAT study schedules as a guide).
Step 3: Keep practicing using real LSAT preptests until these techniques become second-nature.
Step 4: Reach out to a trusted advisor/mentor and get help when you need it. (consider joining the LSAT Mastermind Study Group for unlimited support from Evan and I)
That’s kind of it. It’s tempting to think some decision like whether you should start drilling timed sections 8 weeks before test day or 10 weeks before test day is going to make or break you… it’s probably not. On the other hand… if you spend 2 hours getting sucked down a googling rabbit hole every time you make a decision about how to prep… that could end up wasting a ton of valuable prep time that could be spent much more wisely.
However, if you are the sort of person that likes to plan everything and get’s lot’s of advice, that’s okay too. I’m sort of a micro-planner when I’m trying really hard at something, and analyzing everything worked great for me. Don’t fight your nature.
No matter your strategy, always try to consult experts sources when you are stuck. They’ll often have a new approach to a problem that may help you. That’s one of the main reasons why we started the LSAT mastermind group: we wanted to provide students with several ways (private forums, office hours, webinars, online lessons, video explanations, etc.) to learn from and interact with us so that they didn’t have to put their fate in the hands of anonymous forum posts full of trolls and shills.
When you look in a lot of the prep books, conditional reasoning is just another topic covered in one of the chapters. Because of that, tt’s easy to overlook its importance. Don’t skim this stuff. You need polished critical reasoning skills to have even a hope of a decent score on LR and LG. Not only that, you really can’t be making substantial improvements until you get a solid foundation in conditional reasoning.
Now, learning conditional reasoning cold is the good path, the one that goes straight to 170+ land. The other path brings you into the fire swamp. You’ll be lucky to get out in time to make it to 170+ land in time for the test.
Don’t screw around in the fire swamp. Take the right path the first time and learn conditional reasoning learn it well.